subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)

I've been in a ongoing Facebook debate about the situation in Iran, and for the sake of putting everything in one place (and avoiding the character limit for posting) I felt it best to put a final version of my thoughts here. I'm unlikely to change from these positions without hard evidence otherwise, so people can comment but should not expect further debate.

 

Any who disagree are of course welcome to do so, but I feel that I have laid out an argument based on history with a strong moral grounding.

 

Politics and suchlike behind cut )

Dennis!

Mar. 14th, 2009 08:23 pm
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
It turns out that's the header on the Dennis Kucinich web site. Which makes think we need either a muscial or (ideally) a reality TV show about "America's Most Couragous Congressman" (it must be true, it says so on the web site!). I see real potential about the PBS reality show following around Dennis and his smokin' hot, love at first sight, significantly younger than him wife - assuming we could stop people my my friends and I from trying to sneak into the camera view dressed up like Greys.

Today several of us also pondered the idea of a Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich presidential run. Cambias suggested the bumper sticker "because the voices tell you to."
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
Any of my friends in the Great White North want to comment on the apparent upset of the tories I'm hearing things about today? You can comment on your own blogs, but I want the local skinny.
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
As promised, here's the next round of my political thoughts.

Lovers, Dreamers and Me )
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
Well, that's over. I am working on a larger, Kermit the Frog themed response to the while thing, but I do have a couple of initial thoughts.

One, I am glad that the winner won by a larger enough margin that there is no legitimate cause for complaints - no one "stole the election", no crtitical post election day recounts (yes, we're likely to see them in Missouri and North Carolina, but their outcomes will not change the electoral vote decision one way or the other).

Second, I am very glad that my fellow Commuters (that's the group term for people from Connecticut, dontchaknow) voted down opening up a constitutional convention. The issues that people were pushing as being so critical that they needed a convention just weren't that critical. I don't want to see our state go the way of California with open ballot initiatives. What other people do with their love lives and life-partner decisions makes no difference to me.

If people really want to separate the releigious sacrament of marrage from the legal definition of Civil Union I expect them to also argue that their religious sacraments have no legal bearing whatsoever. If you want our politics out of your sacrament, I want your sacament out of our politics. Hence  everyone who was married in a religious insititution should lose their tax benefits, ability to make medical decisions for their religious spouse and so on. I think that would leave [livejournal.com profile] kriz1818  & [livejournal.com profile] mapmakr , [livejournal.com profile] ashacat  & [livejournal.com profile] netcurmudgeon  and the Fullers as the only people I know with special legal standing for cohabitation & decision-making. The rest of us would have to go back out and find a justice of the peace, and likely pay some back taxes.

On a similar note, I am saddened that Prop 8 passed in California. I am heartened that demographically speaking the tide is turning towards. In another generation I suspect it just won't matter anymore. Until then, you have my solidarity.
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
I'm probably going to segue this into other political natter starting tomorrow, but I do want to put forward one thing I think political parties need to do to restore some sense of trust.

Thet have to publically own or disown their outliers.  )
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)

Yes, I’m still nattering on this.

 

Positive and Negative )
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)

To start, I'd like everyone to bear in mind that I'm honestly looking for answers here, and I'm not trying to undermine anyone's positions. I have friends and relatives on both sides whose minds and opinions I respect, even if I don't agree with them. The problem is that both sides don't trust each other, and they don't trust the people who are supposed to be teasing out the truth.

 

 

Science, I tell you! Science! )
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)

Semi-public musings here. It seems to me that the big problems were facing right now have to do with trust, or, more specifically, the lack of it.

 

Political musings behind the cut )
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
I'm not great at Player vs. Player video games, in part because I don't spend the time mastering the rules the way you have to if you want to be a good player. People can tell me to do things, and explain why they work, but I always get the timing wrong and, as a result, get my ass handed to me. That doesn't make those rules unfair, but it does show that I'm better served when I stick to a few simple moves and repeat them. I'll still lose, but at least I'm not standing there holding my ass wondering what happened.

I mention this as a prelude to thoughts on last night's debate. Prior to the debate I read this article on Slate which discusses how Bill Clinton scored such a big win in the 1990's debates. The answer? Clinton figured out the up up left down move that none of his opponents even thought of: the rules of the debates forbade split screen shots to show other candidates reactions while one candidate was talking. But, this being a supposedly free-roaming town hall, the candidates were allowed to move around the stage. Clinton's team worked out where the cameras would be, built a fake stage and blocked out where old Billy would have to stand to always be in the shot when someone else was talking. This gave him the effect of the split screen and reaction shots without violating the rules and let him dominate the screen time. End result? Bush (and later Dole) got his ass handed to him. (Perot, being a ferengi, actually has a 4 lobed ass and is immune to such assaults. But I digress....)

Based on last night's debate, it sure sounds like someone explained the up up left down move to McCain and he tried to use it. However, he didn't practice enough and, being 72, lacks the physical grace and charisma that made the tactic appear so effortless in the 90s: I have read a half dozen comments this morning on various blogs wondering why McCain was stumping around the stage and in the background of every shot. Was he lost? looking for the bathroom? didn't he realize he shouldn't look for a physical comparison to the younger, lither more physically charismatic Obama? what?

I suspect the final verdict of history will be that he was wandering around trying to figure where this ass in his hand came from.
subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
I have to admit, much as I've been tracking politics this season the news this morning of McCain's running mate caught me off guard. I had heard Palin's name floated, but I didn't honestly expect it.

Two comments here:
First, while this selection might have a lot of symbolism to it and might be a good tactical move for the next 3 months (in the hopes of both rallying the evangelical base and drawing disaffected Clintonites) I don't think it's a good Strategic move. I would have felt the same way about Bobby Jindal. Both are relatively new, young, Republican governors who have been/should be effective in their states. The party needs these people to both burnish their brand and work against the image of the GOP being all old white men. Palin's selection strikes me as eating their seed corn.

Second, interesting and non-conventional as parts of her governing strategy have been, Palin has advocated teaching Creationism in schools - she doesn't even use the Intelligent Design dodge. I don't have to agree with politicans on everything - especially not on thorny emotional issues like abortion - but I have to back my friend Steve F. on this one: our president should at least be someone who understands evolution.

It's science, people. I don't care what you want to teach in church, but science doesn't care whether you like it or not, and if you undercut the scientific method you're undercutting the foundations of the 21st century.

Profile

subplotkudzu: The words Subplot Kudzu Games, in green with kudzu vines growing on it (Default)
Brian Rogers

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 20th, 2026 12:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios